AP or its licensors own all of the content. Except for the rights specifically granted to you in a Content License, AP and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the Content.
You may not copy or reproduce any part of the Content without the express written permission of AP or an AP licensed partner.
You may print off one copy of this image for personal use only.
You may display the image on your computer screen, download it onto a printer for personal use only, and print out copies of the image for yourself or others (for example, if you are giving out flyers or posters at a party).
You may not otherwise reproduce, distribute, or commercially exploit the material without the express written permission of AP or an AP licensed partner.
If you have any questions about whether certain uses of the materials are permitted by copyright law, please contact us at [email protected]
Copyright protects newspaper internet content in the same way that print material does. In its most basic form, this implies that any business organization wishing to duplicate an article will need to get a license or direct authorization from the appropriate publisher. If you publish an article on your website, it too is subject to copyright protection.
In addition to using copyright law to protect original works, artists can also secure ownership of their work by registering it with the U.S. Copyright Office. This registration certificate serves as proof of original creation and allows the artist to file for copyright infringement claims if their work is reproduced without permission.
While newspapers are generally protected by copyright law, that protection may not be enough to guarantee success in court. For example, even though The New York Times publishes extensive online coverage of current events, many individuals have been successful in arguing that these articles are "fair use" under copyright law. The key factor in determining whether something is considered fair use is how much of the work being copied is being used to comment on, criticize, or parody previous works. If you are planning to publish articles on your website that cover similar ground to existing newspaper articles, you should consider seeking permission first.
The magazine and any material published by its workers are owned by the publisher. Individuals who submitted essays, graphics, and pictures, on the other hand, are extremely likely to own the copyright to such works provided they were paid to do so. If you submit work that is used by Life, they will almost certainly ask for permission first before using it. This is a good practice with any original artwork or material that can't easily be attributed to another source.
In short, unless you give Life permission to use it first, don't expect to see your work in future issues.
As the name suggests, the copyright is owned by the public, and images are free for anyone to use, reuse, modify, adapt, and distribute. While the images are copyright-free, it's still professional courtesy to attribute the work's original creator whenever possible.
Yes! It is very common for individuals' photographs to appear on websites without their permission. If you find an image that you want to use on your own site, you should report it as such to the owner or administrator of the site in question. Generally, they will be happy for you to do so and may even give you access to their own photo archive if there is something worth using.
Generally, no. Only artists can grant permissions for their work to be used in advertisements or other promotional materials. If you have questions about whether or not you can use an image in a particular situation, please feel free to email us at [email protected]
There are two main types of licenses: non-exclusive and exclusive. Non-exclusive means that more than one person or company can use the license. Exclusive means that only one person or company can use the license.
Because you theoretically own all of the material you publish on Facebook, you have the right to copyright it. While this license expires when you remove the content or your account from Facebook, it does not apply if "your content has been shared with others and they have not erased it." In other words, if someone posts a copy of your article on their website, it is still eligible for copyright protection even after you delete your original post.
However, commenting on someone else's post doesn't create a derivative work under copyright law. Therefore, you don't own the comment, and you can't claim copyright over it. But since comments may reflect opinions about your subject matter, others may interpret them as you did (or didn't), which could lead them to share those views themselves. For this reason, we recommend that you avoid commenting on political topics or issues you aren't willing to defend publicly.
Finally, note that Facebook's terms of service explicitly state that "you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual license" to use any ideas, concepts, or discoveries included in your comments.