Corroborate means to support someone else's story. If you swear to your instructor that you did not throw the spitball and your pals back you up by saying that you were focused on your arithmetic homework, she might believe you. Depending on the circumstances, corroboration can be enough to clear your name.
Corroborating evidence (or corroboration) is evidence that tends to support a proposition that has already been supported by some preliminary evidence, therefore confirming the premise. For example, W, a witness, testifies that she witnessed X driving his car into a green car. This is preliminary evidence that will likely be used by the prosecutor at trial to prove that Y was the driver. The testimony of one eyewitness is not sufficient to convict someone of a crime, but if this witness is reliable and his account matches that of another witness or evidence found at the scene of the crime, then it increases the chances that the accused is guilty.
There are two types of corroborative evidence: physical and circumstantial. Physical evidence can be documents, photographs, and objects with which the incident is associated. Circumstantial evidence includes facts and inferences drawn from them. For example, if W saw X drive his car into a green car, followed by an accident involving both vehicles, this would be circumstantial evidence that X was responsible for the accident.
Physical evidence can provide strong corroboration of other evidence. For example, if W saw X drive his car into a green car and later found out that his car had a flat tire, this would be strong corroborating evidence that X was responsible for the accident.
Circumstantial evidence can also be very powerful when used properly by a prosecutor.
The term "corroboration" refers to the process of comparing facts regarding an event or topic in order to support or confirm a certain perspective. Corroborating evidence can help verify information that may not be readily apparent, such as when investigating an incident that involved more than one person or when examining circumstantial evidence. Corroborating evidence does not replace evidence that conflicts with the corroborated evidence, but rather provides additional information about the subject at hand.
Corroborating evidence is different from confirming evidence which would provide further support for a hypothesis or conclusion. For example, observing that it was raining outside would be confirming evidence that it was indeed raining; however, observing that all roads were flooded would be corroborating evidence that it was raining heavily. Confirming evidence can also refer to additional evidence that supports a previous conclusion or hypothesis, while corroborating evidence can only support or contradict existing information.
In law enforcement investigations, corroborating evidence is used to verify information provided by witnesses or suspects. For example, if a witness claims that they saw a suspect shoot another person, other witnesses' observations of the incident together with physical evidence such as shell casings could serve as corroborating evidence that verifies the testimony of the first witness.
Corroborates, confirms, and confirms. Verb in travel To corroborate anything spoken or reported means to give proof or information that backs it up. [formal] I had access to a variety of papers that supported the story. They were able to corroborate most aspects of my experience.
[transitive] Corroborate (someone) means to provide evidence that supports their claim or allegation. For example, your boss tells a coworker that she is being reviewed for a promotion and that her performance has been unsatisfactory, then you can corroborate this statement by explaining that her review was not favorable and providing details about her failure interview process.
Here are some other examples: "I will have to corroborate his story with others." Or, "She could not corroborate the date that he said he arrived." Meaning, she could not prove it wasn't him anyway!
Or, "They couldn't corroborate his identity." Meaning, they couldn't identify him through fingerprints or something similar.
This means that he wrote a letter saying he was dead. Yuck!