If you want to be confident that information is real, you need not just verify to see if the source exists, but also to see if it says what the writer claims it says. Things may take on a life of their own once they start getting passed around. It's hard to know what you're going to get when you load up an email or post on Facebook.
For example, suppose I claim to have been given access to secret files showing that NASA has been covering up evidence of extraterrestrial life. You might check with NASA to make sure this isn't true, but even if it is, that wouldn't prove my claim false. It would only show that someone else had claimed to have access to such files and had used them to write about something else entirely. The same thing would happen if I claimed to have been given access to secret files showing that NASA has been covering up evidence of alien life.
In other words, to determine whether or not my claim is true, I need to look at other sources to make sure no one else is saying the same thing. If they are, then I need to ask myself why they would do this.
There are several aspects that contribute to a source's credibility. When you look at a source on the internet, you should look at various aspects to ensure that the information is reliable. These factors include the authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage of the source. An established site with many contributors will be more comprehensive than a single website.
An authoritative source is one that has expertise about the topic and can give helpful information. For example, the Library of Congress is an authoritative source for books because they have experts who can help you find out which books are important and useful and which aren't. Government agencies are also considered authoritative sources because they usually have the power to enforce their findings if the evidence proves them wrong. Websites that charge for access or advertising revenue are not considered authoritative sources.
Sources can be accurate in different ways. Some sources such as books report facts while others such as opinions write about topics that might not be true for stories or arguments. Sources can also be objective, which means that they present both sides of an issue without being biased. For example, a news article would be considered objective because it doesn't favor one political side over another. Objectivity is particularly important when reading reports from organizations such as newspapers or magazines that tend to take a position on issues.
Finally, sources can be timely.
There are numerous primary factors for judging whether or not a source is trustworthy.
Sources that are Credible vs. Non-Credible The reader may rely on credible sources. We believe that the author's views are his or her own and can be supported by facts. Writers should always utilize a reputable source while writing a research paper, conducting research, or reading for background information. Alliances and relationships are another way to determine credibility. For example, National Geographic is a reputable company that produces award-winning educational television programs and magazines that are considered accurate and reliable.
Non-credible sources offer subjective opinions or interpretations of facts and cannot be relied upon for truthfulness or accuracy. They include news blogs, social media posts, and some books and movies. Credibility cannot be determined solely by who publishes something; instead, the reader must study other factors to decide how much weight to give any one source.
In conclusion, credible evidence is information obtained from trustworthy sources. It can be proven through documents such as articles, books, and statistics. Non-credible evidence is information obtained from unreliable or false sources. Credibility cannot be determined just by who publishes something; instead, the reader must study other factors such as sources, clarity, context, etc.