A review article is a secondary source; it is written about previous articles rather than reporting original research. January 14th, 1399 AP European History Review - Conquered England: The Impact of the English Revolution. June 23rd, 1763 AP European History Review - The French Revolution: A Survey of Literature.
Review articles can be useful tools for finding out more about a topic. They are usually written by experts who want to share their knowledge with others. This can be other researchers or teachers. Review articles are often used by students as study materials because they can easily find information about what topics have been discussed by other scholars.
Some examples of review articles include:
Bailyn, Bernard. 2005. The origins of American nationalism: Language, commerce, and ideology in the early republic. New York: Oxford University Press.
Black, Jeremy. 2008. War, politics, and culture in Europe 1648-1848. London: Routledge.
Cipolla, Carlo M. 1970. Genius of democracy: Numa Pompilio Mazzocchi and the creation of modern Italy. New York: Norton.
Duffy, Michael J. 2001.
Review papers, also known as literature reviews or secondary sources, synthesize or assess research that has already been undertaken in primary sources. In general, they summarize the current status of research on a certain area. They are an essential component of academic journals and are often used by university courses to cover more depth than can be done in a single semester-long class.
Review papers are different from articles that report new results from experiments (primary sources). Review papers aim to capture all available evidence on a topic rather than reporting new findings from individual studies. They may discuss previous work on a subject but usually include references to at least some original studies!
In short, review papers are important tools for researchers to keep up with current trends in their fields. They help them identify gaps in knowledge and areas where more research is needed.
Here are some examples of review papers:
Buss et al. conducted a review to see how much violence there is in video games. They concluded that video games seem to have a positive effect on young people's ability to control themselves in stressful situations.
Dowling reviewed studies on gender differences in science education to come up with a list of recommendations for improving teaching practices.
A review article, also known as a review paper, is based on previously published works. It does not include any original research. In general, review articles summarize the available literature on a topic in order to describe the present level of understanding of the issue. They are written for researchers who want to get an overview of the field but do not have time to read through many studies.
Review papers are useful tools for scientists to keep up with current research trends and findings related to their fields of interest. By reading only one review article, scientists can gain important insights about the state of the art in their areas of expertise.
In writing a review paper, the reviewer should be aware that while giving an overview of some recent publications may be easy for a scientist with experience in the field, it may be difficult for someone who is new to the area. Therefore, reviewers should always try to maintain a neutral point of view, avoiding favoring any particular theory or method over others. Review articles are usually written in a concise and clear style, allowing readers to quickly understand the main ideas.
Finally, reviewers should not use information from the reviewed papers to prepare their own papers. This would be plagiarism and should not be done. Instead, they should cite the relevant parts of the papers they are reviewing, so other scientists can learn from them.