To give you an idea, that is around 2-3 pages for a 15-page paper. If you are writing a literature review as a separate task, the length should be indicated in the directions. Generally, they want you to cover enough material to be able to include a reference list, but not so much that it becomes difficult to follow along.
As with any other part of your paper, whether it's a short essay or a longer report, if you find that you need to stretch out your literature review just to keep it within reasonable limits, then it's time to rethink how much space you really need to explain your ideas.
Usually, graduate students think that they need a lot of space when actually what they need is more quality information rather than quantity. It's all about being sensible with your choices and using what you have available effectively. In fact, the more limited your resources, the shorter you should make your review.
Your literature review shouldn't just repeat the aims of your study but should also help explain how and why previous research has contributed to our understanding of the topic at hand. You should also look at studies done on similar topics and see how they have approached explaining their findings. This will help you avoid repeating mistakes and give you new ideas about ways of looking at the problem.
In the absence of particular directions, a common rule of thumb is that the length of your literature review should be commensurate to the length of your overall report. If your work is 15 pages lengthy, 2-3 pages for the literature review may adequate. However, if you have 20 pages worth of findings to communicate, then a 1 page literature review would be inadequate.
A shorter literature review can be useful when you are running out of time or have limited resources available for writing. In this case, it can be helpful to make tradeoffs between including a more in-depth analysis of certain topics versus covering others. For example, if one were reviewing the literature on gender differences in education and there were only two weeks left before submission, an author might decide to focus on studies that examine these differences using experimental methods rather than comparing them across countries (since most research on this topic uses observational data).
Longer literature reviews can be useful when you have sufficient time for in-depth analysis or want to cover all relevant studies. For example, if you are writing up results from multiple experiments (as opposed to just one), then it makes sense to discuss each study's limitations as well as its strengths. Similarly, if you want to communicate all relevant findings from the literature on a topic, then you will need to include some studies that support your claims while rejecting others.
A literary review's length varies according on its objective and readership. The review is often a complete chapter (at least 20 pages) in a thesis or dissertation, however it may simply be a few pages in an assignment. A literature review can be organized and structured in a variety of ways. It often begins with a brief statement of the problem or question to be answered by the study.
The literature review should be written so that it can be understood by those who did not participate in the original research. As such, it should include a summary of the original study's findings as well as their significance for today's readers. A good literature review also includes a discussion of any limitations of the original study, whether theoretical or practical. Finally, the literature review should include a proposal for future research based on what has been learned from the original study.
Often, students will include references to other studies in their reviews. When doing so, it is important to provide both historical context and additional reading suggestions. This will help others understand how previous researchers have approached similar topics and provides information for students to use when conducting their own investigations.
Literature reviews are important components of scholarly work because they allow researchers to show how existing knowledge has changed or developed over time. They also help readers understand the background and assumptions of past researchers, which enables us to see similarities and differences among different approaches to solving problems.
According to one source, they are "usually 3,000 to 10,000 words in length." This website may also provide some guidance on the length of key sections of the paper. BTW, I believe the length of the publication is also affected by where it is submitted. If you submit via our online system, the maximum length is 8 pages.
However, there are many factors involved in determining how long your paper will be. These include the number of sources used, the importance of their content, and the clarity with which they are written. A paper that uses several widely known sources may be longer than one that focuses on fewer or less accessible ones. Likewise, a paper that explores difficult issues may require more space than one that follows a clear path. Finally, a paper that is well organized and clearly written can be shorter than one that does not follow these rules.
In general, a publication should allow for enough space to include all relevant information, while still being readable when printed out. So, depending on the size of your fonts, and the complexity of your ideas, your paper might be between 3,000 and 10,000 words long.