Most academic papers (expositions, persuasive, and research papers) should be written in the third person, using references to other writers and researchers from respectable and academic sources to back up your thesis rather than discussing your own personal experiences. This is because others can verify the information you provide and help you prove your argument or point of view is correct.
The only time it makes sense to write in the first person is if you are describing what happened to you directly related to your argument or point of view. For example, if you were trying to explain why scientists should use evidence from experiments instead of just believing what they think then that would be valid writing. However many other people have done this same experiment and explained their results so you wouldn't need to repeat it. So in this case you could reference your own experiment but most academics would consider this inappropriate since it is not helpful for others to do your work for you. They want to know what tools were used, what questions were asked, what conclusions were made - everything else is secondary.
In addition, writing in the first person often leads to subjective interpretations of data because the writer is responsible for its effective communication. If you feel like you cannot properly express yourself in the first person then you should probably find another way to communicate your ideas.
Finally, writing in the first person is easier said than done.
When a degree of impartiality is desired, third-person is utilized, and it is commonly used in academic writings such as research and argument papers. This viewpoint draws the reader's attention to the topic being presented and discussed. It also prevents the writer from becoming too involved in the story/argument, thus preserving objectivity.
Third-person writing is often required in journalism. The use of this writing style increases the neutrality of the article because the writer isn't associated with any particular viewpoint or agenda.
First-person writing is usually employed by non-professional writers who want to share their views on issues they are passionate about. First-person narratives can be told in either past or present tense, but most commonly use the past tense for consistency. For example, "I am an athlete so I love running races." "She is an artist so she loves painting pictures."
Second-person writing involves the author addressing the reader directly, typically in a narrative essay where they tell a story or describe events that have occurred. For example, "You will like this story so keep reading!" Or "In this part of the essay, we will discuss events that have occurred since the beginning of time until now."
Although some first-person language may be used in personal essays, lab experiments, or survey findings portions of papers, the third-person point of view is most commonly employed in formal academic writing and when referring other people's work to add legitimacy to the concepts. Third-person points of view are also useful when discussing someone else's ideas because it avoids directly attributing those ideas to yourself or your team.
Academic writers often distinguish between their own views on an issue and those of others by using the third person. For example, an author might describe her/his own views on something as "a he says, she says debate with strong feelings on either side." The writer then goes on to explain how other people have different views by using phrases such as "some say," "others believe," and so on.
It is important to be aware of the differences between first-, second-, and third-person points of view when writing academically for the sake of credibility. Using the wrong perspective can confuse readers and give the appearance that you are presenting biased information.
The third person is used in the majority of formal, academic writing. It is necessary to use this form of address when you are referring to someone or something as a general rule, or in a specific context, or in comparison with another thing. This form of address is also required when you are quoting or paraphrasing someone else's work.
In English literature classes, students often identify characters from books they've never read before and ask themselves questions such as "Who is this person?" or "What is her/his dealio?". When teaching grammar, many teachers will point out that questions embedded in quotations require an object relative clause structure. For example, instead of asking "Why did Steve go to the movie?" students would say "Steve went to the movie because he wanted to." Quotations are often used by journalists to introduce topics or arguments they want to discuss or present to their readers. Thus, accurate usage of quotations requires one to identify who said what exactly, where it was said, and how it relates to the current topic at hand.
Second-person points of view are often avoided in academic writing in favor of third-person points of view. Second person can be too informal for academic writing, and it can also alienate the reader if they do not empathize with the topic. First person is also inappropriate for most academic writing because the writer's opinion is given more weight than that of someone else. The focus should be on facts rather than opinions when writing academically.
In addition to these reasons, second person point of view may cause memory problems for some people. If you write in second person, you must remember what "you" and "your" mean. This can be difficult if you have a memory problem like Alzheimer's disease or another form of dementia.
To avoid these problems, try using third-person point of view instead. It is easier to remember what "he" or "she" means if you use gender-neutral language. In addition, others will better understand your writing if you use third-person point of view. They won't feel like you're talking about them directly, but rather about a character who is not familiar or unlikely to sympathize with.
Finally, use descriptive verbs and names rather than first or second person to avoid confusing readers about whom you are speaking.