What are the two realities present in the poem about the man he killed?

What are the two realities present in the poem about the man he killed?

It's also worth noting that the final verse rhymes "war is" with "bar is." This implies that the poem concludes by neatly reminding the reader of the poem's two scenarios: the reality, in which the other guy is dead ("war"), and the fantasy, in which the two men sip a drink together ("bar").

These two worlds exist side by side, connected only by the fact that we know one led to the death of the other person. The poet has created them, but they're also real things that could have existed apart from him. War and bars might still be there if this guy hadn't killed someone back then (or maybe not).

This connection between reality and fiction is what makes poetry so powerful - it can look at something very serious (such as war) and use it to talk about something more light-hearted (such as bars), without getting too heavy-handed. A poet who uses this technique well is able to explore different subjects while still keeping their audience informed and interested.

In conclusion, this poem uses two realities to discuss the danger of violence while still making us think about bars and drinks. It's a subtle yet effective way of adding depth and meaning to what would otherwise be a rather simple story.

What was the attitude of the man he killed?

The poet's demeanor might be defined as sarcastic. This poem is essentially about a soldier killing another soldier for no apparent cause. However, towards the conclusion, he basically confronts the audience with the fact that any guy can shoot another man, but they may be having a beer at a local pub the next time. Thus, showing that not all soldiers are heartless murderers.

This poem was written by Wilfred Owen, who was an English poet that fought in World War I. He died in 1918 at the age of 24 after being shot in the head during combat.

Owen's work is considered symbolic of the horrors of war and is included in many school curriculums around the world.

Have a question about this poem or artist? Ask us! Just post a question using the form below or email us at [email protected]

What is the tone of the poem about the man he killed?

The poem's tones are too frivolous, generating a feeling of irony that calls into question the cause for fighting in the first place. That is, the poem's sing-song tone appears empty, just as the speaker's justification for killing the other guy is finally because it was "just so."

Now, this isn't to say that no one should fight in real life. However, the way people fight in poetry tends to reflect how they would fight in reality: with finesse and without remorse.

As an example, consider these two stanzas from Byron's Don Juan:

Then came a time when every blow portended death, And each sharp word inflicted hurt me more Than all the blows that had before been dealt.

Here, Byron uses irony to show us that his character is not really fighting but rather acting out. Although he says he is going to hit Juan, he doesn't. Instead, he talks back to him tauntingly. This reflects how people tend to fight in reality too; they use words instead of fists because that is what bullies do.

In conclusion, don't ever fight in poetry or reality. It will only make things worse.

How is conflict presented in the poem exposed?

The poem is about men's experiences in the trenches. They are waiting for the German adversaries to act, but nothing appears to be happening. The fundamental struggle is between the soldiers and the inclement weather. They desire to return home, but will most certainly die slowly and painfully in No Man's Land. This truth is made clear through images such as "grim death" and "ghastly scene".

The language used by Sassoon is very poetic. He uses phrases such as "the storm-clouds rolled away", "the sun came out from behind a cloud" and "the wind rose sobbing". These descriptions make the men's situation seem even more hopeless than it actually is. Even though they know that many people back home are suffering too, there is no one to which they can relate except each other. This isolation causes them to feel desperate.

Sassoon was an established poet when he wrote this work. It shows this because some of the words used have a familiar sound to readers who know how his poems usually function. For example, the word "mournfully" is used repeatedly throughout the poem, while "home" and "heart" also appear frequently. This means that Sassoon was able to capture the feelings of his men perfectly using only a few words.

Conflict is an important element in all stories. It is what makes things interesting and enables characters to develop.

About Article Author

Bradley Smith

Bradley Smith has been writing and publishing for over 15 years. He is an expert on all things writing-related, from grammar and style guide development to the publishing industry. He loves teaching people how to write, and he especially enjoys helping others improve their prose when they don't feel like they're skilled enough to do it themselves.

Disclaimer

AuthorsCast.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Related posts