What does Shelley mean by the question in line 27 of the song to the men of England?

What does Shelley mean by the question in line 27 of the song to the men of England?

Shelly asks the men of England in line 27 to quit working to enrich the "lords," whom she refers to as "tyrants" in the first verse, "ungrateful drones" in the second, and "impostors" in the fifth, and who constantly benefit themselves at the cost of the proletariat, or working class.

She is saying that they should stop working to support these rulers because they are wicked people who don't care about their workers.

Shelley also believes that if the men of England stopped working they would be free to find true love like anyone else could. She thinks this would make them happy.

In addition, she believes that if the men of England were not working they would have time to play sports and create art, which are good for your health.

Finally, she thinks that if the men of England weren't working they would have time to talk to each other instead of being isolated from the world because they are rich. Shelley feels that if they lived more sociably they would have more friends and better relationships with others.

Shelley is asking the men of England to think carefully before deciding to stop working because she knows it will cause problems for them.

She wants them to understand that living a life of luxury while their workers suffer needlessly is wrong.

Who is speaking in "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke?

The Soldier is a sonnet in which Brooke extols England during World War I. As he prepares to leave for war, he talks in the voice of an English soldier. The poem embodies the patriotic values that defined pre-war England. It has been interpreted as a declaration of love by some scholars, but it is more likely that Brooke was expressing gratitude for the blessings of life in a free country.

Brooke (1887–1915) was an English poet who served as a soldier, surgeon, and spy during World War I. He died at the age of 31 after being hit by a car near Cambridge University where he had gone to read lectures.

England, that was once so great, Has none to speak her tongue; No long-haired poets sing: But round each village drum Stands one with sturdy arm To lead the charge tomorrow. Oh, could I be that man! Then would I fight and die For my own country's glory-- That she might be the better for me when I am gone.

Now she lies low in dew, And dreams of battle won, While far away on wing Her sons return again-- These are they who fought and fell In France and Flanders field.

How does Shelley defend poetry, and why?

Shelley, a prominent Romantic poet and critic, defends poetry by stating that the poet imagines the forms that make the social and cultural order. Unlike Peacock, Shelley believes that each creative mind builds its own secret cosmos, and that poets are the world's unacknowledged legislators. Also unlike Peacock, who believes that reality is simple, clear, and consistent, Shelley believes that reality is complex, ambiguous, and diverse.

In addition to arguing that poetry creates its own universe, which is an alternative to both materialism and supernaturalism, Shelley also argues that poetry has the power to change people's minds: it can make us feel proud of our country, help us understand other nations, their religions, and their ways of life, and give us hope for future peace.

Finally, Shelley defends poetry against Peacock's attack by claiming that poetry is not only useful but agreeable too. People enjoy reading poems because they bring out certain feelings in us, such as joy or sorrow. In short, poetry is pleasant because it makes us think and feel about reality in different ways.

Peacock disagrees with all of these arguments. He claims that reality is really simple and clear, there are no hidden depths in things, we cannot influence what happens out there, and poetry only pleases because it allows us to enjoy reading beautiful words.

About Article Author

Colleen Tuite

Colleen Tuite is a professional editor and writer. She loves books, movies, and all things literary. She graduated from Boston College summa cum laude where she studied English with Creative Writing Concentration.

Related posts