It is determined by how clear and realistic the evidence is, how logical the reasoning is, and whether a counterargument exists. C. The level of clarity and specificity in the argument, the veracity of the evidence, and the author's assertion.
These are the basic elements that make up an argument. There are other factors to consider as well, such as motive and opportunity, which will be discussed later. Also important is the nature of the arguer: individual or group, familiar or unfamiliar, formal or informal.
When evaluating arguments, it is important to understand that not all evidence is equal. Some facts are more significant than others, so they can lead to better conclusions. For example, if evidence suggests that someone was at the scene of the crime, this information is very relevant, but evidence that person witnessed the entire event does not provide as much help toward determining guilt or innocence. In order for evidence to be useful, it must be accurate and complete. If there are gaps in the information, then it cannot provide a full picture of what happened and thus cannot help resolve the issue at hand.
In addition, arguments are not always logical. Mathematical proofs are an example of logic being used correctly; they show that one thing is true because it follows logically from another. However, some people find problems with mathematical proofs because they do not follow these logical steps.
Which questions must be answered when assessing the persuasiveness of an argument? Choose four alternatives. Is the argument supported by empirical evidence? "O Is there credible proof to back up your reasons? Is there any reason to believe the claim? If so, then the argument is valid." Does it make sense? "S Are the claims in the argument consistent with one another? If not, then the argument is not sound." Does it take into account opposing views? "A Do you understand all the parts of the argument? If not, then you cannot evaluate its strength." Does it use relevant information? "I Is the argument clear enough for you to follow its conclusion?"
These are just some of the questions that must be asked when evaluating an argument. There are other questions that may also need to be considered depending on the nature of the argument; for example, a political argument may have implications for future actions or events that need to be taken into account when judging its validity. However, even if an argument does not seem relevant to any current issue, that does not mean that it is irrelevant; often we use arguments to support positions that no one will ever find fault with. For example, someone may use an argument to support their view that animals feel pain and suffering. Such an argument might not appear relevant to anything at the moment, but perhaps more research can be done on this subject later.
What must you do in your argument's response to dispute a writer's evidence? Explain why this is correct. Describe his role. Provide more recent evidence 5 Shahrivar, 1394 AP European History - Response Essay Sample. Discuss what roles writers play in debates and arguments Get tips on how to write a strong conclusion to your essay. How do writers respond to allegations made against them? What does a writer do when someone makes an allegation against him or her? Does he or she have the right to defend himself or herself? In your response paper, you should be able to discuss these issues convincingly.
Writers often respond to allegations made against them by denying any responsibility for certain behaviors or actions. They may also try to explain why they behaved as they did. Last, but not least, writers usually attempt to justify their actions by citing examples from history that are similar to themselves. These are just some of the many things that writers need to deal with on a daily basis. Even famous writers such as Tolstoy and Dostoevsky had to face criticism from people who believed that their behavior was inappropriate for men of honor. In order to properly respond to such allegations, writers should first understand how accusations work. You should then be able to describe the different roles that writers play in debates and arguments.
Then, review the text using the following tactics to help you determine the argument's effectiveness:
A counterargument is a point of view that contradicts your primary point. Counterarguments are an important aspect of a persuasive writing and speaking technique since they demonstrate that you've explored alternative points of view. They also provide an opportunity to contradict the adversary and demonstrate why your perspective is correct. For example, if someone argues that drinking alcohol causes people to act recklessly, then you could counter this claim by saying that even though drinking may cause some people to act in a reckless manner, it isn't responsible for causing them to act that way.
Counterarguments can be used within letters, e-mails, memos, and reports. For example, if someone claims that drinking alcohol leads to individuals acting irresponsibly, then you could argue against this claim by mentioning other factors such as personal responsibility and social norms that prevent people from acting recklessly when drinking. The purpose of this example letter is to encourage someone to stop drinking and find other ways to cope with stress instead - not to convince them that they should continue to drink or argue that you're right and they're wrong.
Within scientific papers, counterarguments help readers understand different perspectives on an issue so that they can make their own judgments about what weight to give different studies/perspectives.
SS4. What exactly is a good argument?
In an argumentative essay, a counterclaim serves to reinforce the writer's stance by demonstrating how the opposing viewpoint is inaccurate. This counterclaim should also be supported by statistics, dates, and figures to illustrate its legitimacy. As a result, his counterclaim demonstrates how the other viewpoint is erroneous. This can lead to a stronger conclusion for the reader.
A counterclaim is any claim made by the author in response to that of the opposition. The term was first used in print in 1553 by William Tyndale when he wrote: "And as for our counter-claim, we will not spare pains to prove, that such things are done now daily in many parts of Germany." In modern usage, the term generally implies a claim that contradicts the opposition's position. For example, the opposition may argue that marriage is between one man and one woman, while the author claims that it is possible for two men or two women to get married. In this case, the author would be making a counterclaim by arguing that marriage is acceptable under certain circumstances.
Counterclaims are common in debate societies where they are used by team members to respond to the opposition's claims. For example, if another member argues that abortion should be illegal, another member could counter this claim by saying that there are cases where abortion is necessary to save a mother's life.