What happens if sources are unreliable?

What happens if sources are unreliable?

Untrustworthy sources do not always provide factual, accurate, and up-to-date information. Using these sources in academic work may result in the writers' reputation being harmed. For example, if you use an article that contains several mistakes from a source with a limited reputation, your paper will also be viewed as untrustworthy.

It is your responsibility as a writer to ensure that you include only credible sources in your work. If you use sources that cannot be verified for accuracy, then you should include statements indicating that this is the case. You should also indicate why you believe the source to be reliable or not.

Sources can be classified in many ways. For example, some sources are primary while others are secondary. Primary sources are those which have directly observed events or conversations. Examples of primary sources include interviews, documents released by organizations, and firsthand accounts written by participants or observers. Secondary sources are materials such as books, magazines, newspapers, and websites that rely on primary sources for information. These items must be used with caution because they may contain inaccurate information.

In conclusion, what happens if sources are unreliable? If you use sources that are deemed unreliable, then it is possible that your work may be rejected by your teacher or editor. They may ask you to remove the sources from your paper or even delete your contribution all together.

What are some common unreliable sources?


  • Book.
  • Newspapers and magazines.
  • Peer reviewed journals.
  • Peer reviewed articles.
  • PhD or MBA dissertations and research.
  • Public library.
  • Scholarly articles.

What are reputable sources?

Authors that are regarded in their fields of study write credible sources. Authors that are responsible and reputable will mention their sources so that you may verify and support what they've written. (This is also an excellent approach to uncover more sources for your own study.) Credible sources include experts in the field, official organizations, and original documents.

Original documents are letters, reports, or statements obtained from direct contact with someone who was involved in the event being discussed. For example, a document might be a letter written by Lincoln after he was elected president. Official records are documents written by people with official authority over the events discussed in the document. For example, the Declaration of Independence is an official record because it was written by the founders of our country while they were still serving as representatives of their states. Reports are written descriptions of events based on third-party accounts. For example, a report about a crime would be written up by police officers who witnessed the event.

Expert witnesses are individuals who have special knowledge or experience on some topic material to the case at hand. They can be professors at universities, consultants, officials from government agencies, or anyone else with expertise in the area. Witnesses do not have to be present at the scene of the crime; instead, they can review past incidents and other evidence to give an opinion on how likely it is that the crime in question occurred.

Why are blogs not considered reliable sources?

Why is a blog an untrustworthy source? Blogs are often seen as untrustworthy intellectual sources since they are extremely opinionated and may lack the professionalism expected of a scholarly source. Blogs can change their content at any time without warning so there is no way to verify exactly what will be published on them in the future.

Blogs can also be viewed as unreliable because they are generally not peer reviewed. This means that while other people's opinions are being expressed, they could be based on inaccurate information or personal beliefs rather than evidence-based research.

Finally, blogs are written by individuals who have no obligation to be honest or accurate. They can write anything from well-researched articles to poorly thought out diatribes - there is no standard level of quality required to be successful with a blog. Some bloggers may even try to mislead their readers by including incorrect information or taking positions that aren't supported by the facts.

In conclusion, blogs are usually seen as less trustworthy than books or journals because they are produced by individuals who have no connection to academia and no obligation to provide correct information. This means that they can publish anything from well-researched articles to poorly thought out diatribes - there is no standard level of quality required to be successful with a blog.

What is reliable and unreliable?

Untrustworthy sources do not have connections to verified, current evidence. Reputable news stories frequently provide links to their sources inside the paragraphs, and the links should direct the reader to the main source of information, which is likewise a credible source.

Reliable sources are trustworthy ones that you can trust to tell you the truth about what's happening. Of course, it is difficult to verify the truthfulness of sources over time, but there are some signs that can help you decide whether or not they're reliable.

Unreliable sources tend to produce short reports with little analysis of their own. They may report rumors or allegations without checking them out first. In fact, many unreliable sources will go so far as to publish false information as fact just to get attention or spread panic.

Reliable sources are more thorough. They will usually take time to investigate a topic before reporting on it. They will also cite other sources in their articles so you know where they're getting their information from. Finally, reliable sources will often include links to their sources inside the article, so you can follow up on them if you want to learn more.

Now, this isn't an all-inclusive list and I'm sure you can think of other things that could be considered reliable or unreliable sources. But these should get you started in the right direction.

Why are secondary sources unreliable?

The difficulty with secondary sources is that you are viewing the original information through the eyes of a different writer or content provider. Their perspectives and biases will influence how the information is delivered. As a result, secondary sources are untrustworthy as primary sources of evidence. They can be used to support or contradict the findings of the study but cannot replace them.

In addition to this, secondary sources are often not complete. For example, if I were to use The New York Times as my main source of information, I would not find some articles. These could be because they do not fit within the scope of my project, or they have been written by journalists who do not work for The New York Times. However, by using secondary sources as well as primary sources, I can ensure that I have covered all relevant information and that my thesis is supported by credible evidence.

Finally, secondary sources can be subjective. For example, one reader's interpretation of an article may differ greatly from another reader's. This is why it is important to read more than one secondary source and compare their findings with those of other readers or studies. This will help you determine the reliability of the evidence provided and allow you to make an informed judgment about its usefulness in supporting or contradicting your hypothesis.

About Article Author

Sharon Goodwin

Sharon Goodwin is a published writer with over 5 years of experience in the industry. She loves writing about all kinds of topics, but her favorite thing to write about is love. She believes that love is the most important thing in life and it should be celebrated every day.

Related posts