What is a cogent answer?

What is a cogent answer?

A strong and compelling rationale, argument, or example. [formal] There were several compelling reasons why Julian Cavendish should be informed of the Major's imminent return. His interest in the story itself was one reason; another was that he needed someone to carry out important business transactions for him while he was away.

What does "cogent" mean?

Using force to persuade the mind or reason: compelling persuasive proof. B: appropriate, germane, and compelling analysis 2: the ability to persuade or restrict compelling forces: a cogent argument 3: a sound reasoning process or course: a coed class with only two students enrolled 4: an accurate understanding of something 5: a good explanation or justification: a cogent account of events 6: a fair judgment 7: a correct decision 8: a useful tool 9: a proper application 10: a convincing demonstration

Cogent evidence is clear and consistent, easily understood and accepted by the audience, which leads them to believe it.

What are the synonyms for "cogent"?

"cogent" synonyms and antonyms

  • Compelling,
  • Conclusive,
  • Convincing,
  • Decisive,
  • Effective,
  • Forceful,
  • Persuasive,
  • Satisfying,

What is a cogent sentence?

Cogent definition It is straightforward and easy for the mind to understand and believe. In a sentence, provide some examples of cogent. 1. When the homebuilder failed to respond to my query, I realized he wasn't the ideal guy to build my family's house. 2. The professor's explanation of post-modernism was quite cogent.

What is the meaning of "cogent reasoning"?

Powerful and compelling evidence or reason that leads to a conclusion with certainty.

Cogent reasons are those that lead to a single definite conclusion. Cogency is the quality of being cogent - the opposite of vague or inconclusive. Thus, cogent reasons are clear and consistent.

A statement is cogent if it leads to one clear conclusion. If you read something in the newspaper that states that "dogs smell like fish" and then go outside and see someone's dog lying in the street, you know what conclusion to draw: dogs do not smell like fish. That statement is cogent. It tells you everything you need to know, and nothing more.

Statements can be cogent even when they give rise to several different conclusions because they provide clear and convincing evidence for only one of them. For example, if I say that "Saul Goodman is an idiot", you might conclude that he is an idiot but also that he is not an idiot. However, since there is no evidence that would lead me to doubt that Saul Goodman is an idiot, that statement is cogent.

What is a cogent question?

"clear, logical, and compelling" (of an argument or case) There are a variety of compelling arguments against fur that do not necessitate delving into racist sophism. In order to be effective, arguments must be clear, well-reasoned, and presented in a manner that others will find convincing.

Cogency is the quality of being persuasive; the ability to ask and answer questions clearly and convincingly. Cogent questions are those that get to the heart of the matter, allowing the listener to come to his/her own conclusion. Questions can be both direct and indirect. Direct questions require a simple "yes" or "no" response, while indirect questions allow for more than one answer. For example, when asking why someone does something, it is direct if the questioner wants to know whether they were offered money or not; otherwise, it is indirect.

Indirect questions are used to discover information about someone's beliefs or motives. They can also help clarify our understanding of what happened. By asking about reasons behind his actions, the police officer learned that the robber was interested in buying cars and not money.

What is the opposite of corroboration?

Weakness, invalidation, shaking, confutation, rebuttal, and enfeeblement Strengthen, confirm, fortify, and support are synonyms. The opposite of confirmation is weakening, which can be physical, such as a weak link in a chain-link fence; or mental, such as when someone weakens an argument against their position.

Corroboration is the process by which facts that support or fail to support a hypothesis are used to determine if there is enough evidence to confirm the hypothesis. If more supporting evidence becomes available, then the hypothesis must be modified or replaced with another one. Corroborating evidence can come from different sources. For example, if an experiment yields contradictory results when performed multiple times, then we can be sure that the phenomenon being studied is not reliable. If the results of two experiments support each other's conclusions, then we can be certain that at least some of those conclusions are accurate. Corroborative evidence can also include observations made by others, such as eyewitness accounts or reports from third parties. In science, corroborating evidence is evidence that strengthens but does not completely prove our hypothesis. Only when all possible hypotheses have been considered and none found to account for all the evidence will we know that our theory is correct.

How do you explain coherence?

Coherence refers to how anything, such as an argument (or a portion of an argument), "hangs together." When something has coherence, it means that its elements are properly connected and all point in the same direction. A talk may not make sense or be difficult to follow if it lacks consistency.

For example, let's say I claim that trees are green because they have leaves. Your first thought might be that this argument is wrong because trees are not the cause of trees' greenness; rather, they experience greenness due to other factors. However, if I continue by saying that leaves are also green therefore trees are green too, you would realize that I am correct about trees being green because they have leaves. In other words, the argument "trees are green because they have leaves" has coherent structure: It makes sense since it's all connected together.

You can tell whether an argument or piece of evidence has coherent structure by looking at how well it hangs together. For example, suppose I claim that trees are green because they have leaves. You think that's not right, so you give me another argument against my conclusion, which is that trees are green because they absorb light frequencies that we see as green. We could then write down a new argument called "trees are green because they absorb light frequencies that we see as green," and we would find that it too has coherent structure! This shows that our original argument had coherent structure too.

About Article Author

Sharon Goodwin

Sharon Goodwin is a published writer with over 5 years of experience in the industry. She loves writing about all kinds of topics, but her favorite thing to write about is love. She believes that love is the most important thing in life and it should be celebrated every day.

Related posts