These Mini Review articles cover focused aspects of a current area of investigation and its recent developments. Mini Reviews are peer-reviewed, have a maximum word count of 3,000, and may contain no more than 2 figures or tables. Authors are required to pay a fee (B-type article) to publish a Mini Review. These articles are ideal for summarizing new research findings.
Mini Review articles should be relevant to a general readership. Therefore, they should make meaningful contributions to the field by combining evidence from multiple sources with insights into how this evidence relates to clinical practice or furthers our understanding of disease pathogenesis. They should also be concise, but not so brief as to be irrelevant to today's readers.
Authors are expected to follow the guidelines for standard articles published by their respective journals. However, due to the limited word count, authors will need to be particularly careful not to exceed the length limits set by each journal. In addition, reviewers will be limited in what they can write about an article since they must write a review within a certain time frame. Thus, authors should consider whether some topics could be discussed more thoroughly within a Mini Review rather than a full-length article.
Some examples of good Mini Review articles include ones that: summarize new research findings on a specific topic; focus on a single question or concept; use evidence from only one study but still provide a useful overview.
How to Use the Article Review Format Correctly It should be between 200 and 300 words long. It provides a synopsis of the review question, the primary study examined, and the study's results. It is important to note that references should not be cited in the abstract. They will be included in the body of the paper.
Abstracts are written for readers who have no time to read the whole paper. Therefore, they must be short and sweet. Including only the most important information, leaving out details that can be found in the full text, saves time for the reader. Additionally, journals usually require authors to submit an abstract before they submit a manuscript so they can decide if it is worth publishing. If you haven't reached a decision on whether or not to publish your article after reading its abstract, then there is no reason to waste your time writing one.
In addition to being short and sweet, abstracts should also demonstrate understanding of the topic under discussion. This means that they should be relevant to the field and include sufficient detail that reviewers can follow the argument presented in the paper. Avoid using jargon when writing an abstract as it makes it difficult for others to understand your work.
Finally, abstracts should be self-contained. This means that they should not rely on information found in the body of the paper for clarification.
What Is the Function of an Article Review? Article reviews are a type of criticism of another author's article or journal piece. You'll be evaluating its merits and flaws, as well as its source legitimacy and relevance to the topic or concerns it attempts to illuminate. Your goal is to help the editor improve the article for future publication by identifying problems with content, format, and grammar.
Reviewing articles allows scholars to share their knowledge with a wider audience by publishing in academic journals. The peer review process is used by journals to ensure that only high-quality material is published. In addition, reviewing helps researchers develop critical thinking skills and identify important issues within their fields of interest.
Who Are the Authors of Articles That Get Reviewed? Scholars write many different types of articles for various reasons. Some authors may want to publish their work immediately upon completing it while others may wish to have it reviewed by other experts before going public with their findings. Regardless of the reason, all authors should be aware that their work will be read by others and judged against a set of criteria before being accepted for publication.
Scholars can be divided up into three main categories based on why they write articles: research-based academics, practitioners/instructors, and journalists. Research-based academics spend most of their time writing about topics that fall under the scope of at least one of their studies or experiments.