The editorial review process typically consists of seven steps: The editor looks over the paper to see if it should be reviewed. The editor reads the reviews and determines whether to reject the manuscript, encourage the author(s) to rewrite and resubmit the work, or solicit more reviews. The editor may also decide to revise the paper himself and submit it for publication.
So, how does one become an editor? There are several ways to become an editor. You can apply directly to journals, or you can contact editors-outgoing by emailing previous Editorial Boards members or other established writers/editors and asking them if they need help with their workload. Some journals have open calls where they will seek out new editors.
What is the role of an editor? That depends on the journal! Some edit their published articles very little while others use editorial staff to help them with editing submissions before they are sent out for peer review and then again after the revisions are returned by the reviewers. However, regardless of the role, all editors work with authors to make sure that articles are clear in their writing and data are appropriate for peer review. They may also provide feedback to the authors on how to improve their article.
The peer-review process also includes editorial review. Typically, editors will do a preliminary pass on a piece to evaluate whether it is worth sending it out for peer review. They will generally determine if the paper is within the scope of the journal. If so, they will identify potential reviewers and send the paper out for peer review.
Editorial review should not be confused with peer review. Peer review is a term used for the evaluation of research articles by other experts in the field. In order to be considered for publication, papers must first be sent out for editorial review. Only after this has been completed can they be sent out for peer review.
In conclusion, an editorial is a publication that is not produced by researchers, but instead represents an opinion from an editor or editorial team. These opinions are usually based on the findings of others and often include suggestions for further study or research. Editorials are important because without them there would be no need for other publications. There are two types of editorials: those that are independent and those that are published alongside research articles.
The journal editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. The following are the most common decisions that are made: accepted without any changes (acceptance): the journal will publish the paper in its original form. With minor revisions (revise & resubmit): the author(s) will be asked to revise their manuscript according to the comments received from the reviewers. These revisions may include new experiments or additional analyses. Before final acceptance, however, the authors must agree to all of the conditions required for publication. Accepted with major revisions (reject): the journal will not publish the paper in its current form. Instead, it will provide the authors with suggestions on how to improve the study so that it can be considered for future publication.
An editorial review is an evaluation of an article carried out by a member of the editorial team. For some areas of the publication, an editorial review may be the only judgment of an article. This is more common in non-research publications such as book reviews, comments, opinions, and so on. In research articles where there may be many similar articles, a single expert reviewer may be asked to evaluate several articles.
The editor who invites submissions for an editorial review should state the criteria used to select reviewers in the invitation letter. Reviewers are usually selected based on their expertise and they are often asked to comment on various aspects of the article. For example, an expert in health economics might be invited to review an article on new drugs because this person could provide valuable insight into how the costs and benefits of the drug compare with alternatives.
Reviewers can either be individuals or groups. Individuals can be chosen based on their specific expertise, while groups can be chosen based on geographical location (e.g., global reviewers), discipline, etc.
Individuals and groups agree to review articles submitted to the journal and then write a summary of their thoughts which are included with the final version of the article. They are not paid for their work but may be provided with open access to the journal's papers at no charge.
There are many reasons why an editor might want to carry out an editorial review.
6 Easy Steps to Plan, Document, and Implement Your Editorial Strategy
How to Write an Article Review