The term "tragic defect" is derived from the Greek idea of Hamartia, which was utilized by Aristotle in his Poetics. The fatal weakness of Shakespeare's tragic hero Hamlet is his inability to act swiftly to kill Claudius, his uncle and the killer of his father. Procrastination is his deadly weakness. Despite knowing that acting against conventional wisdom will get him into trouble, he fails to take action until it is too late.
Shakespeare uses this concept of a tragic defect to explain why Hamlet does not kill Claudius after he learns that he has murdered his father. Even though he knows that killing another person without good reason would be wrong, he lets him live because he believes that doing so will bring about a better outcome for Denmark (or improve the world). But because he delays taking action, he proves himself to be weak and unable to deal with adversity. Thus, he dies young.
In conclusion, the tragic defect that makes Hamlet such a great character is his inability to act swiftly to kill Claudius. He tries but fails because he is weak and cannot face life without his father.
In Greek tragedy, Hamlet's tragic defect, or hamartia, is indecision. When Hamlet learns from his father's ghost that Claudius murdered him, he quickly pledges vengeance, as most people would in similar circumstances. But then he pauses to consider whether or not to take action, delaying what could be considered a legitimate response to the crime.
This characteristic is shared by many other tragic heroes, such as Iphigenia, Oedipus, and Ajax. All of them are willing to sacrifice themselves for their country, but cannot make up their minds about how to act. This leads to many problems for them personally as well as their communities, because none of them knows what course of action will be most effective in resolving the issue at hand.
In conclusion, Hamlet suffers from tragicalhamartia, which is the classical definition of tragic weakness. He wants to fight against injustice, but can't come to a decision about how to go about it. This causes him to miss out on some good opportunities (to fight Claudius) and also put himself in dangerous situations without really knowing what will happen next.
A fatal fault (also known as a "tragic flaw" or "hamartia") is a literary device that can be described as a feature that eventually leads to a character's downfall or even death. It can also be called out by other characters, which triggers a reaction from the protagonist that causes him or her to suffer a terrible fate.
Some examples of tragic flaws include: myopia, lust, anger, ignorance, and vanity. These are all features that certain characters have that ultimately cause them to die (or at least suffer serious consequences).
In literature, authors often use this device to drive home a moral lesson while keeping their readers engaged. It can also help make certain characters more memorable than others.
In the modern novel, the tragic flaw is most commonly found in characters who are considered "great men". These are people who have led rich lives but finally pay the price for their many accomplishments. Alexander Hamilton, Charles Mingus, and John Lennon are some examples of great men with tragic flaws.
The concept of a "great man with a tragic flaw" can be found in many cultures and historical periods. However, it became popular in the West following the publication of Edward Albee's play Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? In 1962.