Bad authors continue to write badly because they have numerous reasons—many of them, in their opinion, very excellent reasons—for doing so. Writers are awful because they cling to the reasons of poor writing. A bad piece of writing is nearly always a love sonnet dedicated to oneself.
Bad writing typically includes lengthy exposition dumps inside dialogue—characters repeating what they already know for the advantage of the audience or reader alone, or telling us stories about events that occurred off-screen or away from the story being presented. Readers and audience members are astute....
Lousy authors don't comprehend this, which is why they're bad writers. They believe their work has attained a particular degree of brilliance, thus they are frequently resistant to revising or rewriting. They might appear pompous, proud, and arrogant. But, in reality, it's a combination of sloth and fear (mostly fear).
The best way to tell if you're a bad writer is if someone else tells you so. If so, then you should try to come up with some better arguments as to why you're not. For example: "Everyone hates my books" or "No one ever reads my stories." Both of these statements are true, but they aren't particularly helpful in arguing for or against your claim to being a bad writer. In fact, they're just excuses. The only real way to know if you're a bad writer is by actually writing something and seeing what happens. If no one likes it or reads it, then you're probably not very good at writing.
Also note that being a bad writer isn't necessarily a negative thing. For example, Albert Einstein was considered a bad writer by most people who read his papers. However, he was a great scientist and mathematician. So, being a bad writer isn't always going to prevent you from doing great things.
Finally, remember that you can learn new skills and improve yourself daily, so even if you are a bad writer now, you could become a better one over time.
Emotion is evoked by good writing. Good writing ties things together. A good narrative is one that the reader can relate to. Too frequently, authors just compare themselves to other writers. Those with more vocabulary and smoother language appear to be the finest of the bunch, according to all technical standards. However, this is not what defines a good writer.
To be a good writer, you need to understand your audience. You need to know how they think and feel, so you can connect with them. Only then will your writing truly stand out. It's not enough to write well - you must write from the heart too.
Writing is an art form, but it's not magic. If you want your work to be appreciated, you have to share its value. The best way to do this is by connecting with your readers on a personal level. They should feel like you've spoken with them directly, instead of through a keyboard.
The most important thing to remember when trying to define a good writer is that there is no right or wrong answer. Each writer has their own style and voice which determines how they present themselves to the world. No two writers approach writing in the same way!
Another reason I believe so many authors despise writing is because, at first, and this is essential, since the benefits of writing practice are too numerous to begin to enumerate, writing requires so much while offering so little in return. Writing a good story means developing a plot that keeps your readers interested, creating characters they can relate to, and expressing yourself clearly enough for others to understand.
The only thing writers love more than reading about themselves doing nothing is thinking about themselves doing something. So the next time you feel like hating writing, remember that it's very likely a manifestation of an inner conflict between wanting to do something else with your life and being afraid to take the risk required to go beyond what you know.