A case with a long and essential portion expounding dicta, for example, may necessitate a distinct section in your brief called "Dicta." Whatever aspects you choose to add, keep in mind that the brief is a tool for personal use only. Include extra parts if they will aid in the structure and utilization of the brief. For example, if there is an argument section you might want to include any relevant authorities or cases that might help the court make its decision.
The goal of the brief is to provide a clear and concise summary of the facts of the case and the law that applies to those facts. The more thoroughly you cover these topics, the stronger your case will be. Of course, you should try to include only the information that is necessary to make your point, but if you leave out anything important, it could hurt your case rather than help it.
Since the brief is intended to be a quick reference guide, it's best to write in a way that is easy to understand. Use simple language and avoid complex legal terms unless they are explained directly in the text. Also, make sure that everything in the brief is supported by evidence from the record.
Finally, read over what you've written several times before submitting it for review. Any mistakes that come to mind after reading it over carefully can be corrected before sending off your brief.
A "brief" is a written contribution that includes thoughts, remarks, and suggestions on a legislative committee's current topic of study. The term generally applies to written comments made by individuals or organizations to help the committee make its decision about what legislation to consider next. Although not binding on the committee, briefs are often taken into account when making decisions about which bills should be further studied or brought to a vote.
Briefs are used by members of the committee to express their views on specific issues before them. Often, groups or organizations will write briefs on topics of interest to them. These may include business associations, civil rights groups, environmental organizations, labor unions, religious bodies, and others. Bipartisan briefs are common and can provide valuable input for the committee as it considers pending legislation.
In addition to expressing their views on particular bills, members of Congress may also submit briefs in order to raise issues that they believe should be considered by the committee. For example, a member might submit a brief arguing that certain provisions contained in a bill should not be included in any legislation that comes before the committee. Or, she might argue for including additional provisions in existing laws that would benefit her district or state. Submissions under this category are known as "expert briefs."
A "brief" is a collection of papers delivered to a barrister who has been hired to attend, advise, or create documents in a case. The brief includes remarks, normally made by the instructing solicitor, as well as all relevant documents. The term comes from the French word "brouillon", which means "incomplete work"; thus, a brief is a collection of materials that have not yet been assembled into a complete document.
The term "brief" also refers to the written statement provided by an accused person to his or her lawyer prior to their first court appearance. In some jurisdictions, this document is required by law to contain certain information about the defendant's right to counsel and to remain silent. It is usually called a "defendant's brief" or a "notification of rights".
In England and Wales, the term "brief" is also used to describe the written argument presented by an attorney to persuade a judge to decide in favor of their client. These briefs are usually based on previous cases involving similar facts, so they can be quite detailed and useful to reuse in other situations.
At its most basic level, a brief is a request for action. However many briefs are actually instructions to someone such as when you're making an appointment with a lawyer.
A "brief" in the United States is a written legal argument provided to a court to assist it in making a decision on the legal issues involved in the case. The standard procedure is for the party seeking the judicial remedy to provide a written argument to the court and send a copy to the opposing party. Judges often refer to these briefs when making their decisions.
The term "brief" comes from the French word brieve, which means "short note." In law schools around the country, students are taught that the perfect brief should be no longer than briefthese words of wisdom on how not to waste your time with a brief that is too long.
An excellent brief demonstrates the following qualities: clarity of expression, correct grammar and syntax, proper organization, and fair treatment of each point made. A poor brief is difficult to read and understand, uses sloppy language, is poorly organized, and does not treat all the points raised by the opposing counsel adequately. Although judges may have personal opinions about particular lawyers or cases, they will not say so in public.
Briefs are usually between 500 and 1,000 words in length, but some cases can require as much as 2,000 words if there is a lot of complex evidence or legal reasoning to be presented. Longer briefs are common when dealing with appeals courts or when there is more than one attorney working on a case.
At a minimum, every brief should include the facts of the case, the legal question, the legal principle employed in the case, the majority's decision and reasoning, and a summary of any concurrences and dissents. Your brief should not be more than 600 words, not including concurrences and dissents....