A commentary may also bring attention to present advances and speculate on future directions of a certain issue, as well as provide original facts and express a personal perspective. A commentary should be written for an educated audience that includes scholars and nonscholars alike. The reader should gain insight into the topic through analysis of both sides of the argument.
There are three main purposes for writing commentary: education, enrichment, and entertainment. Education is the primary purpose of commentary. Even though your readers may not be experts in your field, they can learn from your work. By presenting both strong and weak points of an issue, you can help them make informed decisions. Enrichment is another purpose of commentary. You will give your readers new ideas or perspectives on topics they have always been interested in. Entertainment is the last purpose of commentary. You will write humorously or dramatically to keep your audience engaged. However, even though comedy and drama are important components of any good commentary, they cannot replace the first two purposes.
Education and enrichment can only happen when you take time to explain complex issues in simple terms. This will allow even those who are not familiar with your field of study to understand what is being argued about. As you discuss different views on an issue, your readers will be able to form their own opinions about it. This is where entertainment comes in.
The author of a commentary is likely to have extensive understanding of the subject and is ready to give a fresh and/or distinctive perspective on current issues, basic principles, or widely held beliefs, or to explore the ramifications of a recently adopted innovation. A good commentator is able to convey his or her ideas clearly and effectively. Avoid summarizing the work of others; always provide new or different perspectives.
In general, a good commentary will:
Be well written (clearly expressed with proper grammar and punctuation)
Make accurate comments about the topic at hand
Offer useful insights about the subject
Encourage further discussion or debate on topics raised in the commentary
Be unbiased and fair minded in its judgments
Commentaries are often used by scholars as a tool for exploring topics within their field of expertise. Thus, a good commentary should strive to capture the interest of readers by offering an original perspective on issues related to its subject matter. At the same time, a good commentary should not be overly scholarly and should avoid complex language or academic jargon when writing for a general audience.
Some examples of good commentators include Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Charles Darwin. Authors of bad commentary include Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Pol Pot.
A remark is a reaction to another person's point of view. Commentaries are most commonly seen in statements of personal perspectives on current problems and events. The goal of commentary is to provide readers with new and insightful viewpoints on a topic or event, allowing them to better understand their own position on it.
Commentaries are often used by writers to offer their opinions on current events. However, they also appear in books, magazines, and newspapers as self-contained discussions on various topics. Authors may use commentary to explain their views on important issues in their lives or in the world at large. Publishers may use commentaries to attract attention to upcoming releases or series.
Commentaries can be written by individuals or groups. If others agree with the perspective offered, then they may want to read the work that sparked such agreement. If an author's viewpoint is not agreed with by many others, then they may seek out other commentators to hear different points of view.
Individuals may write commentaries to express their opinions on topics that interest them. For example, a reader might find commentary interesting if it were written by someone outside the mainstream media who saw the world through different eyes. Publications may also use commentaries to increase awareness of their products through the voices of popular authors.
Write up your observations and analyses of the text you read in a commentary. You should develop a clear and explicit thesis statement for the novel, poetry, or drama under consideration. Your thesis statement should describe your position or argument in relation to the text. It should be expressed in formal language and not contain vague or general terms.
Commentsaries are written for the most part from a literary point of view. This means that the author(s) will often discuss the style of the work examined, analyzing how the words are used and why. The commentator will also usually give an opinion on the text's merit as a whole - whether they like it or not! Finally, they will often mention other works by the same author or topic worthy of discussion.
In addition to all this, the commentary must be written in an impartial manner, without any apparent bias one way or another about the book/poem/play. This means that you should show an equal interest in both positive and negative aspects of the text, its characters, etc.
Generally, a commentary is composed of three parts: a summary, an analysis, and a conclusion. The summary discusses the key ideas in the text while avoiding lengthy explanations or detailed discussions. It is therefore best used as a brief introduction to the work. The analysis section explores the meaning of those ideas in more detail, particularly when there is more than one concept involved.
A commentary is a response to a recently published piece. The chief editor may request a commentary or it may be supplied on its own. A commentary may be written by an expert in the field who has not been asked to write an article, or it may be written by someone with a strong opinion about the subject matter.
Commentary pieces are important for two reasons. First, they give readers more information about subjects covered in print news articles. Print journalists don't have space to report all the details of an issue so they select what information to include and what information to leave out. However, through interviews and other sources of information, they can put together a picture of what's happening that fills in some of the gaps left by the original article.
Second, commentary writers can influence the topic of future articles. If a journalist writes an article on gender equality in science labs then she might get contacted by women scientists who would like to contribute to further discussions on this topic. Or perhaps there is now-publicly available research on gender equality in science labs that hasn't yet been included in the original article. In these cases, the journalist could use her network of contacts to find scholars who would be willing to comment on the topic in writing.